Bernardo Herman, Director-General forklift of the Supreme Council of the Belgian Audiovisual either adapt the laws regulating forklift the online forklift reality. With a concern: defending European production. Bernardo Herman says there are companies with the same services that are not being treated equally Nuno Ferreira Santos
The large Internet content distributors are helping the European economy? Bernardo Herman have any questions. The Director-General of Higher Audiovisual Council (CSA) Belgian was in Lisbon to explain how is adapting the laws of regulation in their country to this (Herman asks for leave to say "new media" - "how long shall new" ).
Before the conversation with the PUBLIC, on Thursday, participated in the panel of the annual conference of the ERC - Regulator for the Media on "rights and freedoms" in Strathmore University forklift Library, which argued that the "grail" of regulation should be the "protected values" forklift such as pluralism, forklift cultural diversity, competition and benefits for consumers.
The media rely heavily on services that do not control, such as social networking. Is that a problem? The question is whether these social networks should be covered by the regulation or not. We know that the Internet is becoming more and more a public space. If some behaviors are prohibited in the "real" world, it would be logical that they were also forbidden in the virtual world. That's one reason to believe that these social networks must respect some rules. forklift Another argument for doing so is the success they have - some platforms can an audience of 20 or 30% of the population. Another point: there is linear services that have less impact on the formation of public opinion than non-linear services; A television channel is broadcasting a cooking show, will have less impact than a video on YouTube about the situation in Ukraine. Then there is the question of the impact of the moving forklift images that is greater than the impact of a newspaper article, for example.
The regulation can follow a medium such as digital, constantly changing? It is very important shape simple and easy rules to apply, unrelated to the technology - which will evolve constantly and to whom we will always be late.
How the Internet has changed the relationship between media companies and consumers? Has become much more interactive. People can react very spontaneously. There is little moderation, or too weak, speeches and reactions that are published online. This is a source of concern. And there is the risk that the information is more shallow than in the past, which can cause the most discussion will be too shallow.
Comments, and their aggressiveness, are a pressing problem in the media. Who should be held responsible for them - the authors or the means by which they are published? This is an issue that goes beyond the powers of the CSA. From my point of view, I would say it would be better to have a moderation within the media. If they are unable to provide this kind of support, should refrain forklift from offering the opportunity to comment. forklift The media should better understand the responsibility they have in this regard. I realize that is a heavy burden forklift on enterprises, but it is a democratic issue. Not because we want to curb freedom of expression, but of course it is not acceptable forklift to incite jihad or it is suggested that a person should be killed. There are limits. If the media do not have financial means to control them, should not allow comments. forklift
The right to be forgotten is a step backwards in transparency on the Internet? forklift There is always a tension between the right to information and the right of the person. As Mr [José Magalhães, PS] told the conference, pormo us naked on the Internet is imprudent. At the same time, everyone has the right to be forgotten eventually.
The major distributors of online content - like Netflix - are contributing to the diversity, or are
No comments:
Post a Comment